Question - What is the difference between Looking
and Seeing?
Osho - THERE IS a great difference. Looking
means you are looking for something; you have
already some idea to look for. You come here and you
say, "I am looking for Teertha" -- then you have an
idea. Then you look all around for where Teertha is.
The idea is there already.Looking is already
prejudiced. If you are looking for God, you will
never find Him -- because looking means you have a
certain idea already of who God is. And your idea is
bound to be either Christian or Judaic or Hindu or
Mohammedan. Your idea is going to be your concept --
and your concept can never be higher than you. And
your concept is bound to be your concept. Your
concept is bound to be rooted in ignorance,
borrowed. At the most, it is just belief; you have
been conditioned for it. Then you go on looking.
A person who is looking for truth will never find
it, because his eyes are already corrupted, he
already has a fixed concept. He is not open. If you
have come to me to look for something, then you
already have an idea -- you will miss me. Then
whatsoever I say you will interpret according to
your idea and it will not be my meaning, it will be
your meaning. You may find yourself agreeing with
me, you may find yourself not agreeing with me --
but agreeing or not agreeing is not the question at
all, it is not the point at all. You have missed me.
You can agree, but you are agreeing with your own
idea.
You say: "Yes, this man is right," because this
man fits with your idea. Your idea is right so
that's why this man is right. Or, you don't agree
because it doesn't fit with your idea. But in both
the cases your idea is more important. You will miss
me. A man who is looking for something will always
be missing it.
Seeing is just clarity -- open eyes, open mind,
open heart. Not looking for something in particular;
just ready and receptive. Whatsoever happens, you
will remain alert, receptive, understanding.
Conclusion is not there! Conclusion has to come: by
your own eyes you will see -- and there will be a
conclusion. The conclusion is in the future. When
you are seeing, the conclusion is not already there.
When you are looking, the conclusion is already
there. And we go on interpreting according to our
ideas.
Just the other night I was reading a joke:
A small child is reading a pictorial book on wild
life, and he becomes very intrigued with the
pictures of ferocious lions. He reads whatsoever is
there, but one question is not answered there so he
asks his mother.
He asks his mother: "Mom, what type of love-life do
lions have?"
The mother said, "Son, I don't know much about Lions
because all your father's friends are Rotarians."
If you have some idea in the mind, you corrupt. Then
you are not listening to what is being said -- then
you are listening according to yourself. Then your
mind is playing an active role. When you are
looking, mind is active. When you are seeing, mind
is passive. That is the difference. When you are
looking, mind is trying to manipulate. When you are
seeing, mind is silent -- just watching, available,
open, with no idea in particular to enforce on
reality.
Seeing is nude. And you can come to truth only
when you are absolutely nude; when you have
discarded all clothes, all philosophies, all
theologies, all religions; when you have dropped all
that has been given to you; when you come
empty-handed, not knowing in any way. When you come
with knowledge you come already corrupted. When you
come in innocence, knowing that you don't know, then
the doors are open -- then you will be able to know.
Only that person who has no knowledge is capable of
knowing.
Source: Osho Book "A Sudden Clash of Thunder"
|